There are few people in U.S. leadership over the last 50 years more committed to the New World Order (world government) than Joe Biden.
On April 23, 1992, Biden, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's European Affairs Subcommittee, published in the Wall Street Journal, "How I Learned to Love the New World Order." In it he expressed a need for a "permanent commitment of forces for use by the Security Council" -- a U.N. standing army -- adding, "Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter?" His plans would destroy national sovereignty and establish world government over all nations under the United Nations.
Of course, a standing army would empower the UN beyond the ability of any participating state to resist, including the United States. Its failure to have a standing army, and the Constitution forbidding a government over the United States, are the reasons we are not already ruled by a world government. It is the one thing left prohibiting such. Without an army, it cannot enforce its will; with one it can. To advance its causes, it must depend upon the persuasion of a majority of nations rather than brute force. That is the breath of life Biden was referencing.
For America, such would nullify the Constitution (which Biden has many times sworn to uphold) and the Declaration of Independence. Few Americans want world government. America would be subject to the whims of the majority of nations, of which very few endow their people with any specific rights of freedom from the government, as does ours. Liberty would evaporate from the planet.
This was no fluke position. In a speech as vice president to the Export-Import Bank conference in Washington D.C. on April 5, 2013, he reiterated that theme. "The affirmative task we have now is to, um, create a new world order, because the global order is changing again."
The next year he told graduating cadets of the U.S. Air Force Academy Class of 2014, "You, your class, has an incredible window of opportunity to lead in shaping a new world order for the 21st century." In Davos 2017 he doubled down on the same theme to billionaires gathered at the World Economic Forum. The theme showed up again in the Council on Foreign Relations January-February 2018 issue of Foreign Affairs co-authored with Michael Carpenter ("Pushing the Great Reset, William F. Jasper, The New American, March 22, 2021). If Biden is committed to anything, whether cognitively failing or not, it is world government.
The latest terminology used to advance world government now is the Great Reset endorsed by the world's billionaires, notably George Soros, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and articulated best by World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab in his book "COVID-19: The Great Reset." To the question of when things might return to normal, he responded, "The short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the 'broken' sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory" (Ibid. p. 13). Global trajectory is code for world government. Schwab was thus admitting that COVID was being used to advance rationale for world government. LibertyUnderFire has published extensively on the use of climate change to advance the same objective. Both world health (pandemics) and world climate (disasters) need world government solutions, they falsely argue.
But it's not just Biden who seeks to upend our constitutional republic with world government; his administration is brimming with those equally committed to the same, 32 thus far holding the highest offices in the executive branch ("Biden CFR-TC-BG Appointees," The New American, March 22, 2021). It is the most world government (globalist) devoted administration in U.S. history as measured by membership in the CFR, Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission.
Donald Trump only had seven such members, making him the least world government-influenced president in 100 years. Because Trump performed the miracle of the century -- getting elected -- defeating "shoo-in" globalist favorite Hillary Clinton, every globalist on the planet crawled out of the collectivist sewer to destroy him.
But the world government threat cannot end without identifying the center of the secret combination to take over the globe -- the Council on Foreign Relations. Their 100-year dominance of both major political parties, Republican and Democrat, stems from their infiltration of both, the media and, more recently, the Internet ("Who Ran America Before Donald Trump," LibertyUnderFire.com).
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) headquartered in New York City acknowledges its level of influence as "the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States." John J. McCloy, chairman of the CFR from 1953 to 1970, noted how his organization filled the positions of power in both parties with CFR members. "Whenever we needed a man we thumbed through the role of the Council members and put through a call to New York." Presumably, McCloy filled the ranks of nine U.S. presidents in this manner.
That a similar process was in place when Barack Obama came to power in 2008 was verified by an October 6, 2008, WikiLeaks email from CFR senior fellow Michael Froman to "Barack" providing him with a list of their selections "for senior-level jobs in a potential Administration." Not surprisingly, "The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money" ("Biden's Non-diverse 'Diversity' Cabinet," William F. Jasper, The New American). The same is almost certain for Biden as well.
Prior to Trump, no one got to the top without the CFR's assistance. In 2020, through the most controversial presidential election in U.S. history, fraught with fraud, foreign and domestic, the globalists have entrenched themselves once again with a man who loves the New World Order.
Harold W. Pease, Ph.D., is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for more than 30 years. To read more of his weekly articles, visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.